Forum ..:: NooreMadinah Network
Forum ..:: NooreMadinah Network
Home | Profile | Active Topics | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Different Sects & Groups
 Others Sects
 DR.FARHAT HASHMI, A MYSTERY,AN ENIGMA"
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author  Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/07/2011 :  14:06:21  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
IN BLESSED MONTH OF RABBI UL AWWAL, UNFORTUNATE VICTIMS OF DR.FARHAT HASHMI DONOT CELEBRATE MELAAD! pity on them! They call it SHIRK and BIDDA and its ridiculous that a new British Brand Sect which itself is only about.20 years old, a bidda itself is finding SHIRK BIDDA in others.
SAHI BUKHARI,VOL,2,PAGE 975, it is told in Hadith:
"Prophet sallallaho alaihe wassalam said, " ....I have no fear that my ummah will committ Shirk but I fear love of this world might take them away from straight path".
And love of this world is so OBVIOUS in Victims of ALHUDA that Toronto's Newspaper gave title of "RICH MAN'S PREACHER" to Dr.Farhat.
Here is link, copy and paste on google and click on Defenders of Truth,Milad Un Nabi:
http://www.sweetmadinah.blogspot.com/

Here is answer to their blame of SHIRK on sunneez:
narrated by Abu Ya'la from Hudhaifa and about which Ibn Kathir said "its train of transmission is good". Abu Ya'la said "The Prophet has said:



"One of the things that concerns me about my nation is a man who studied the Qur'an, and when its grace started to show on him and he had the appearance of a Muslim, he detached himself from it and threw it behind his back and went after his neighbour with a sword and accused him of associating partners with Allah ."



"I then asked 'Oh Prophet of Allah , which one is more guilty, the accused or the accuser? The Prophet said 'It is the accuser'." Completed, with all Praises to Allah and peace and salutations be upon our Master Muhammad and the family of Muhammad and his Companions .


When I UNFORTUNATELY attended Dars of Surah E Fatiha by Dr.Farhat's Student SHAMIM AYUB from Toronto, she explained MAGHDOOB E ALAIHE as those people who go to shrines etc.
for above issue i cite Hadith narrated by Hazrat Abdullah Ibn e Umr radiallaho t'ala:
"The most mischeivious and worst people will be those who will paste verses meant to condemn idols upon believers.
(badtareen aur shararti log wo hon gey jo bton kee muzamat mei utree hoee ayaat ko momineen per chaspaan kerein gey".(sahi Bukhari,Vol2,PAGE 10024)

Moreover, the work Sheet incldes word to word meaning and Last Column is your OPINION.
It is Hadith of Masnad E Ahmed,"
ONE WHO INTERPRETS QURAN ACCORDING TO HIS PERSONAL OPINION WILL BE THROWN IN FIRES OF HELL."
Thus.Dr.Farhat distributed FREE TICKETS TO HELL to millions and billions students.
Interpretation of Quran was taught to few SAHABA E Keraam directly by Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wassalam such as Hazrat Abdullah Ibn E Abas.
Once muslim army was fighting in Syria, one muslim soldier entered the heart of enemy's army.One sahaba recited verse of Quran, i cite in Urdu,
"Jaan boojh ker halaqat mei na paro"
Hazrat Ayub Ansari was also present in army ,he said, this verse is not for occasion of Jihad, then he himself rushed to enemy's army and got shahadat.
When Hazrat Ummer started teaching in masjids, the syllabi was divided into two sections, one for all public and one for people of extra ordinary wisdom to learn sensitive aspects of Islam(Fiqha ,Quran's commentary etc) where as dr.Farhat issued certificates of scholars of Quran to every tom dick and Hary and allowed them to teach it as well.
One of her Alima Sahiba said, 'AAP K PAAS DIMAAGH HEI NA PHIR 4 IMAMS K PEECHEY KYOON JAATI HEIN, QURAN SAMJHEIN AUR DOOSRON KO SAMJHEIN:
I said," Quran hamein AN AMTA ALAIHIM yani INAAM YAFTEGAAN ko follow kerney ko kehta hei aur Inaam aam per naee khaas per hota hei, Ambiya ,sideqeen, shuhda, saaliheen. Kisi Nabi ney deen k maamley mei PERSONAL OPINION NAEE DIYA, Jo Allah ka hukm hoa wo kaha.
Poorey Quran mei sirf aik refrence hei PERSONAL OPINION deyney ka wo hei IBLEES,MALOON,SHAITAAN jis ney personal opiniom diya:
"MEI ADAM KO SAJDA NAEE KEROON GA MEI AAG SEY BANA HOON ADAM MITTI SEY BANEY HEIN"
Aur Ahkam e Ilahi per personal opinion deyney ka anjaam kiya hoa Iblees k liye....

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/07/2011 21:18:29
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/08/2011 :  00:10:38  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Assalam o Alaikum!
Note down the SUMMARY OF ALHUDA conveyed in Urdu.
1:Alhuda naami Organisation naye Firqey sey ziyada naya deen maloom hoti hei jahan Dr.Farhat kee is terha ATAA'T kee jaati hei goya wo insaan naee "AL-KHUDA" hon Naoozubillah.
2:Is naye deen ka Kalima:
QURAN PERNEY AUR PERHANEY MEI DR.FARHAT goya (naoozubillah) LA SHAREEK hein aur in key student in key khareedey hoye ghulaam hein.
3:IS NAYE DEEN KEE SHARIAT:
1400 saal sey Islam ko ghalat samjha gaya , Sirf Dr.Farhat fesla ker sakti hein k kiya haram hei aur kiya halal hei. tamaam sahaba, tabaeen,taba tabaeen aur aaj tak aaney waley Ulema aur Imaam ney AUTHENTIC ISLAM pesh naee kiya (LA HOLA WALA QUATA ILA BILLA).Aur jo Ulema dr.Farhat sey ikhtilaf kerein ya inko hidayat kee taraf bulein wo sab der haqeeqat inkee shohrat sey jaltey hein (LAHOL WALA QUATA ILA BILLA)
4:SHARIAT,FIQHA,HADITH gharz k Islam k her pehloo kee dr.Farhat WAAHID AUTHORITY hein.
5: Dr.Farhat ka firqa ya deen Islam mei IJTIHAAD BANUL ULEMA aur JIHAAD BARAYE KHAWATEEN sey Inkaar kerta hei aur apney APAAHACH Firqey k perokaaron ko MASNOON DUAON k ilawa sirf wuhi hadith sikhata hei jo dr.Farhat kee ZAATI PASAND k Islam k mutabiq hon kyoon k ager sari hadith perhi jaye tu deen mushkil aur peecheeda ho jaata.
5:Dr.Farhat ka pooooora deen ya firqa jo pocket size kee choti choti kitabon per mushtamal hei sirf aik chotey sey hand bag mei sama sakta hei.Jin Ulema ney sadyoon mehnat ker k hazaron kitabein likhee wo PRACTICAL ISLAM k liye faidamand naee (LA HOLA WALA QUATA ILA BILLA)
6:Chehrey Ka perda KHAWATEEN k dermayaan bhee kiya jaye sirf AMREEKA k airport per chehra khola jaye, jesa k dr.Sahiba khood kerti hein aur in k ataat guzaar Sunnat E Nabvi sey ziyada Sunnat e Dr.Sahiba ko terjee deytey hein.
7:Duniya ko shirk sey bachaney k liye ye zaroori hei k AULIYA E KERAAM AUR MAZARAAT KEE KHOOB KHOOB BEIZZATI O BEHURMATI kee jaye jo inhon ney "Allah k madadgaar naami cassette mei kee.(LA HOLA WALA QUATA ILA BILLA.
8:GOWNS sirf doraan e dars zaroori hein kyoon k ALHUDA kee AALIMAEIN Neem Uryaan lebaas mei FACE BOOK per APNI boutiques kee KHOOD modelling kerti hein, kisi kee bahu beytee kee izzat ka khiyaal na hota tu naam likh ker in ALHUDA BRAND AALIMAON ka face book id disclose kiya jaata.
9: RATTA LAGAO JANNAT KAMAO key usool per chahey Quran Ratt lo ya hadith ,jannat mil jaye gee kyoon k aaj kal k modern life style mei ammal kerney ka waqt naee milta (LAHOLA WALA QUATA ILA BILLA.
10: Koee Marr jaye tu QURAN PERNEY KA KOEE FAIDA NAEE, Dr.Farhat kee cassette "MOUT KA BAYAN LAGAO" .
Aik dafa aik aadmi ghusal khaney mei gira,brain hammorage hoa aur phir faalij. Oos kee beytiyaan, bahuein,potiyaan shaed Tang per gaein kyoon k oos kee waja sey Dr.Farhat k ghar ghar honey waley Dars k NAAGHEY ho Rahey hon gey, hamein dawatnama mila, "HAM NEY DARS RAKHA HEI TAKEY ABBA KEE MUSHKIL ASAAN HO".
in k ABBA kee halat behter honey kee bajaye aur bigger gaee aur jaan attok gaee (ASTAGHFIRULLAH). On hee me see aik aurat kee SUNNIYAT thoree buhat baaqi thee, chupkey se kisi k ghar honey wali mehfal e melaad mei gaee aur abba kee mushkil asaan honey kee dua ker k aa gaee. Allah ney Apney Habib sallallaho alaihe wasalam k sadqey dua sunee aur oos aurat k abajee chal basey.Ham jab afsos k liye gaye tu Na Fatiha na Darood, Dr.Farhat kee cassette chala dee gaee (kiya ye badnaseeb log samajtey hein k Quran nafa naee puhnchata Naoozubillah sirf Dr.Farhat kee cassette hee MURDEY ko faida dey sakti hei.???
Kis bedardee sey Islam k parakhchey uraye gaye aur jo inko maanta hei oon per SHAITAAN kee khaas mehrbani dikhaee deytee hei, SHITAAN tu Sirf SEEDHEY RASTEY WALON K KAAM ROKTA HEI jesey Ulema E Haq k kaam mei rokawatein hein, SHAITAAN ney ALHUDA walon k kaam kabhi na roka balkey isee k tawan hee sey tu ye sari duniya mei AANDHEE TOFAAN KEE TERHA phela."
ALHUDA waley Forum per aein khood ko DEFEND kerney k liye, leykin Dr.Farhat AAJ TAK OPEN FORUM per naee aein na ink perokaar aein gey, JO HAQ PER HOTA HEI WO MOON CHUPA KER BHAGTA NAEE .


APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/08/2011 01:36:09
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/09/2011 :  19:09:34  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
A SECT/OR NEW ISLAM STILL UNDERCONSTRUCTION?????
In year 2000, Dr.Farhat Hashmi was totally against WASEELA.In later years,some journalist FARZANA HASAN interviwed her and asked her verdict about WASEELA of Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wassallam, Dr.Farhat said that she was doing her research on it.
Attention Readers!
If her search was still incomplete why did she start teaching HER VERSION OF ISLAM or underconstruction sect??????????
She herself and her blind followers seem pathetically confused.
I fear day of Qiyamat will come before dr.Farhat completes her research so better follow Islam already proved CORRECT since 1400 years.
Moreover, Islam accepts GAWAAHI of 2 women, Dr.Farhat is 1 woman, she doesnt have any twin sister e.g Dr.Sharbat Hashmi then how come 1 woman can issue verdicts about Islam.???
Prophet sallallaho alaihe wasallam taught us to love and follow ahl e Bait.
Hazrat Nafeesa Bint Zaid bin Imam Hasan was a renowned scholar of her times. Imam Shafaee used to get knowledge and guidence from her.Inspite of having authentic knowledge, Hazrat Nafeesa didnot declare herself as Imam in Fiqha because she knew even If woman's research is correct,she cannot be sole authority.That is why Hazrat Nafeesa taught,guided and enlightened Imam Shafaee who is one of the four Imams of Fiqha.For ref. of Hazrat Nafeesa:
www.zia-ul-ummat.com

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/09/2011 19:12:24
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/12/2011 :  21:41:41  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
DEMOLITION OF JANNAT AL BAQI BY THE INSPIRATIONAL MENTORS OF DR.FARHAT HASHMI
1:The way Dr.Farhat Hashmi is turning muslims to PHOBIACS OF SHIRK AND BIDDA and is demolishing the pre-existing pillers of faith but ALLAH SUBHANHU TA'ALA saves whom He wants to save from going astray,but exposing CRUELITIES is our duty, the scared graveyard of Jannat Al Baqi was demolished by the inspirational mentors of Dr.Farhat.
2:The part of cleavage of Mount Uhd in Madina which was touched by blessed head of Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wasallam and sweetest fragrance of Prophet's hair made hajeez kiss that part just because of Love of Rasool Allah sallallaho alaihe wassalam was plucked out to save people from SHIRK by the so called khadmein of haremain shareef ASTAGHFIRULLAH!
Where as history tells that Hazrat Asma Bint e Abu Bakar had gown of Rasool Allah sallallaho alaihe wasallam and she used to dip it in water to give it to those who asked for it for shifa.No one blamed her for committing Shirk.
Similarly, followers of Dr. Farhat Hashmi often invade mehfils of Melaad and shriek on women who kiss their thumbs after listening to blessed name of Rasool Allah sallallaho alaihe wassallam.Kissing thums like this is sunnah of Hazrat Abu Bakar radiallaho tala. Here is link in light of Hadith:
http://www.islamicacademy.org/html/Articles/Kissing_Thumbs.htm
Dr.Farhat's followers availed an empty hall one of the canadian university, hired buses to take her trapped victims,held Q/Answers session and FORBADE use of Rosary (Tasbeeh) by saying ISLAM MEI TADAAD MUQARAR NAEE HEI (Astaghfirullah Thus rejected teachings of ASHAB E SUFFAH who gained knowledge directly from Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wasallam. People with sound religious background hardly jump into her trap of "we love all Muslims" and stay away, even most of the muslim students didnot even leave their rooms of university hostels to attend Q/Ans session.


APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/12/2011 21:42:19
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/20/2011 :  02:16:29  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Dr.FARHAT HASHMI, ANOTHER ZAKIR NAIK
Dr.Farhat Hashmi - another Zakir Naik
Dr.Farhat Hashmi, unfortunately carries the same views as Dr.Zakir Naik, Nasir-ud-Deen Albani, Dr.Abu Ameenah Bilal Phillips and the Salafi Movement. Her target audience has been the rich women of Pakistan. Once she gained momentum amongst the elite class, she expanded her scope of work to Dubai, America, Canada and other Western countries; still focused on the elite and secular educated women.

Her outreach to women has been on the pretext of teaching them to learn the Holy Quran. Then she turned her attention to teaching ahadeeth, but not just any hadith; only Sahih Hadith. So, she also preaches the new unfounded rule called, "follow only the Quran and Sahih Hadith". The only problem is that Dr.Farhat Hashmi cannot trace this statement either in the Quran, nor in any Sahih Hadith, so how did she concoct this rule? Very simple. She is a Muqallid (a blind follower) of Maududi, Nasir-ud-deen Albani and she tows the punch line of the Salafi Movement. Dr.Farhat Hashmi has the following three (3) methodolgies in her "scholarly" approach to fame:


Learning the Quran: In teaching and learning the Quran Dr.Hashmi has left all classical methods, and adopted the so called modern approach of starting from scratch. Her students don't have to learn the grammer, just know 300 words in Arabic and you can master the language. She is doing much better than Rosetta Stone (a language institute) that requires at least 1000+ words as a requirement to master a language. When Dr.Hashmi is preaching the Quran, her approach is like that of Ahle-Quran. Meaning, learn the Quran because it is the word of Allah not the word of a man. Follow only the Quran. This is the first stage of brain washing, because no one can argue against such a blind-sided statement. It is a half-truth explained as an absolute truth. Her followers think that this methodology is flawless, and that they don't have to follow anyone. But if they stopped to think for a moment, they would realize that Dr.Hashmi didn't learn the Quran in the cradle. She learnt her Quran from a man who she trusted; her father. Meaning, she had to do taqleed of her father in the learning the Quran. If taqleed is denounced by her as Shirk then in her own words she has implicated herself as a mushrik; unless she denies following her father blindly in learning the Quran? By not undertanding the fundamental meaning of Taqleed and Guidance in the Quran she is actually not qualified as as scholar of the Quran. In fact, Farhat Hashmi openly rejects the tafseer of Sayyidna Ibn Abbas (radhi allaho anhu) regarding the ayat of the Quran, "...wa idhaa qurial Qura'anu fastamiu lahu wa ansitu.." She has put her "Fahm-ul-Quran" (Understanding of Quran) above this tafseer and said clearly in her audio posted on her website titled "Namaz-e-Nabwi" that this Ayat was not revealed regarding salaat!
Learning the Hadith: She claims to have learnt Hadith from Nasir-ud-deen Albani, Ghair Muqallid. Eventhough she rejects the concept of blind following, she is nothing but a blind follower herself. Because, it is Albani and the Salafi Movement that has put a limitation on Hadith - meaning follow only Sahih hadith. It is not something imposed by the Noble Messenger of Allah (sallahu alayhi wa sallam). In reality she is a rejector of hadith, By rejector what I mean is that she does not follow any weak ahaadeeth. She only follows Sahih Hadeeth. However, the hadith related to things that make water impure is weak. So, Dr.Farhat Hashmi needs to explain why she is selective in her choice of weak hadith. If the book "Fadail Al-A'maal" is mentioned to her, she will immediately accuse the great Hadith Scholar - sheikh Zakariya Kandhalvi (ra) - of authoring a book that containes nothing but weak ahaadeth. However, when checking on the purity of water before ablution, Dr.Hashmi has yet to explain to this Ummah why she accepts the weak hadith regarding the pre-conditions of wudu in regards to using water. In her analysis of Hadith, she does not even understand the hadith of Imaam Bukhari (please see this subject explained in my comments below this post).
Learning the Fiqh: She is a rejector of Fiqh, like Dr.Naik. She rejects the four established schools of Fiqh. She rejects the popular hadith of Muadh ibn Jabal (radhi Allahu anhu) where the principles of Fiqh were established by the noble messenger of Allah (sallahu alayhi wa sallam), that is, Quran, Sunna, Ijma and Ijtihaad. Surprisingly, her research is by large taken from the "Fiqh" works of Abul Ala Maududi - who was a master in twisting terminologies and matters of Fiqh to benefit his movement. I would like her to explain clearly to this ummah what she thinks of Taraweeh Prayers? After all she loves to encourage women to attend the Mosques; so the best month to be in the Masjid is the month of Ramadhan. So, should her followers be in the Mosques, praying Tarawih? Can she substantiate that women, especially the Sahabiyaat performed tarawih behind the noble messenger of Allah (sallahu alayhi wa sallam) in the month of Ramadhan every night, after Isha Prayers and those rakaats were eight 8? I have the following challenge for Dr.Farhat Hashmi: A woman going to Al-Huda comes to Dr.Hashmi and says, "Dr.Hashmi an ant fell in the pot of food that I was cooking for my husband and guests for breaking their fast. What should I do?" I would like Dr.Hashmi to proof from Sahih Sarih ghair muaridh Hadith what this woman should do? Should she throw away all the food or keep the food? What basis of Qiyaas will she use? And does this constitute to be an opinion or hadith?
http://truth-sincerity.blogspot.com/2009/10/farhat-hashmi-another-zakir-naik.html


APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/20/2011 02:17:38
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/20/2011 :  02:20:40  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
TARIQ JAMIL FAVOURING ALHUDA, DEOBANDEEZ CALL THEMSELVES HANAFI SUNNEEZ THEN HOW COME THEIR SCHOLAR IS FAVOURING GHER MUQALAD JEW BRAND INSTITUTE??? TO CREATE A HYBRID SECT OF GHER MUQALDEEN'S SECT AND DEOBANDISM??? OR A POLITICAL COMPROMISE FOR INTERNATIONAL POPULARITY????REMEMBER! BIRDS OF ONE FLOCK FLY TOGETHER!!!
WATCH YOUTUBE WITH FULL SCREEN TO AVOID YOUTUBE'S VULGAR SIDE SHOWS
Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 1] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization


Go to YouTube
Play video
Maulana Tariq Jamil has favourable views about Al Huda organization and believes it to be a very good organization for women and wishes that there should be more of such organizations in Pakistan. I…
00:10:05
Added on 11/08/2009
14,505 views


Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMM6G2SZDjY&feature=related
Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbC_DLCEDRE&feature=related
Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z515ZPjVBo&feature=related
Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fBfGlez6d8&feature=related
Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvdNfW_ShFI&feature=related
Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-thbWmh164&feature=related
Loading video preview from YouTubeThere was a problem connecting to YouTube. This video may not exist or it may only play on YouTube. Try going to their website: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmye_Ras55Q&feature=related
http://truth-sincerity.blogspot.com/2009/10/farhat-hashmi-another-zakir-naik.html


Colonel_Hardstone
29-09-2009, 01:36 PM
:salam:

Maulana Tariq Jameel gave once a Bayan at the Al-Huda Institute. You can listen to it on YouTube.

:ws:

Here it is:

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 1] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HTCebE2aZU)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 2] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMM6G2SZDjY&feature=related)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 3] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbC_DLCEDRE&feature=related)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 4] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z515ZPjVBo&feature=related)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 5] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fBfGlez6d8&feature=related)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 6] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvdNfW_ShFI&feature=related)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 7] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-thbWmh164&feature=related)

Maulana Tariq Jamil - Bayan in Al Huda [Part 8] - Dr. Farhat Hashmi's organization (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmye_Ras55Q&feature=related)



APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/27/2011 09:16:59
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/23/2011 :  04:05:22  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
TARIQ JAMIL PRAISING MODOODI AND OTHER DEOBANDI MUFTEEZ REFUTING TARIQ JAMIL ( WHO MIXED GHER MUQALDIYAT AND DEOBANDISM TO MAKE NEW TOOTY FRUITY FLAVOUR OF NEW SECT IN NEW ERA) AND HIS WRITTEN GUSTAAKHI AGIANST SHAAN E RISALAT.
WATCH YOUTUBE WITH FULL SCREEN TO AVOID YOUTUBE'S VULGAR SIDE SHOWS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eChEM2XQPRo&feature=related



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYu4iKJi_Bw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oXqyuATiQs&NR=1


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQNxgbVBatU&feature=related

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/27/2011 09:16:17
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 02/24/2011 :  11:21:41  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
SELF -CONTRADICTORY SECT OF ALHUDA, TABLEEGHI JAMAAT.
WATCH YOUTUBE WITH FULL SCREEN TO AVOID YOUTUBE'S VULGAR SIDE SHOWS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zj73DQMMq3w&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzFQSGI-01E&feature=related


APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA


Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 02/27/2011 09:17:47
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 03/08/2011 :  21:21:57  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT FRAUD OF DR.FARHAT'S ALHUDA,EXPOSED BY STUDENTS OF ALHUDA :
Background Information Date of Release: 18 Dec 2010


Al-Huda WikiLeaks: Farah Rabbani and Rabia Rabbani Exposed
The Disgrace of Al-Huda International In London


Dear All,

Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu,

I am writing to you all to warn you about two corrupt Al-Huda teachers, namely Farha Rabbani and her daughter Rabia Rabbani who have created a lot of fitnah in our London Al-Huda class that existed once upon a time… Their evil intrigue and mischief continues.

In brief our story is as follows: Farha and her daughter arrived at our Masjid to conduct Dawra-e-Quran in late 2008. It was the goodwill of existing teachers who gave her this opportunity. After Ramadhan, Farha and her daughter immediately enrolled nearly all listeners present for a Saut-al-Quran al-Huda course and took over the existing class. The former teachers became her own students. Interestingly, we already had a pre-existing registered Al-Huda establishment nearby run by Nusrat Asif and Wajiha Mughal but our class had no link with this place whatsoever. In fact, Farha Rabbani never even mentioned the name of this place to us, as if it never existed!

One and a half years later, after completion of only 10 paras, our results were prepared, we had a party and announcement of positions, Ustazah phoned in live on that day, no-one from the other Al-Huda site was invited and days later Farha Rabbani left for Pakistan to renew her visit visa as she had been doing every six months. And at this point this time, our class ran into difficulties.

Before going any further I feel I must introduce myself. My name is Sofia Ahmad. I was a main figure in the class. In fact I was Farha Rabbani’s main assistant and adviser, her right-hand. I was helping with all class matters: Marking papers (English and Urdu), CD production, recording, cassette-playing etc. Alhamdulillah, all the work I did was for the sake of Allah with his special help and Guidance, even though I was a student myself. The one thing I was not involved with was financial matters. I was in possession of all class records and test papers because I was the one marking papers and maintaining class records.

In April 2010, I sent Ustazah a lengthy class report by email and expressed to her my concerns about the way the class was being run. All this was done confidentially in order that the matter did no damage to the reputation of Al-Huda. Please see attachment for the main points of our complaint. The main charge against her was that she had cheated us in our results, something which Ustazah later acknowledged in her email to me.

• Class Politics: Our class was purely a mother and daughter show. While her mother was away renewing her visa in Pakistan, she had left no-one in charge to sit the tafseer. Rabia was totally incompetent and incapable of sitting a tafseer. She was seldom ever present in class and her own group had all but vanished. If she was ever present, her only job was tajweed. As soon as her mother left however, she suddenly became regular and it was obvious that she only come to occupy her mother’s seat.

• Our Fake Result: Before she left, Farha Rabbani had prepared our result for the 10 paras and left me with the records. I later studied the whole result in detail and identified that cheating had taken place. Basically she had played a clever game of politics to promote certain favourite students and demote others she saw as a threat to her position. What benefit were students giving her? She was using students as drivers, she was using their flats for cheap accommodation, she was using students to pay for all class expenses, pay for photocopying, phone-cards etc, (why the hell were we paying fees?) and she was using student addresses to order deliveries of Al-Huda products (and other material) that she was selling in class. At the same time, she wanted to appease certain people who would guarantee her place in the Mosque, those related to Mosque committee members. Therefore these certain people were made to re-sit missed papers and failures especially, and then they were given positions.

We had 6 positions in total and the two people that had no re-sits or failures did not make the top 3 positions. Is this possible? Is this fair? Is this Al-Huda policy? Can you imagine a Quran teacher cheating her students in their results?? La Hawla Wa La Quwwata Illa Billah. I am forwarding you all the result and it’s explanation so you can see for yourselves what went wrong.

• Unsatisfactory Teaching: Our class was also very dissatisfied with the teaching methods being employed in our class. We had no proper teachers and were being taught over phones subjects like Arabic grammar which was proving very unpopular. You might be wondering what has Arabic grammar got to do with Saut al-Quran. Good question. Our course was being dragged out, the real intention was to sell us as many books as possible and we had noticed that the price of everything had been gradually creeping up, even the fees had gone up.

• Financial Mess: Our class had been paying regular fees. In addition we had also been giving thousands of pounds in charity money, Qurbanis, donations for H11 etc. None of this was ever recorded and I am sure of this. We had no book-keeping system in our class. Our registers contained no record of figures only ticks for fees. Every time anyone gave charity they did not write it down. Also, apart from on one occasion, we have never seen any receipts or confirmation that our money has actually reached Al-Huda. Farha Rabbani has always maintained that ALL our fees money and charity goes to Al-Huda and is used to educate poor people who cannot afford to pay fees. Ok, so we have a teacher who has been coming and going to Pakistan every 6 months. Her daughter is not a British citizen here either. Therefore she is not entitled to benefits. She has to pay for her ticket, living expenses, rent and so on. Is she not even covering her costs? Is her husband sending her money in rupees and then she converts them into pounds. Usually it’s the other way round for most people. While this is theoretically possible, she has not been able to prove it or insist on it.

When I sent my report to Ustazah, I let her know that we wanted to keep our class and requested for a change of teachers because there were no proper teachers (Farha Rabbani was in Pakistan) and Rabia alone could not handle the class. Moreover after all the dishonesty that had taken place (proven in results), we could no longer trust these teachers or learn Quran from them. Did they have no fear of Allah. We had realized what was going on and we could not allow such fraud to carry on in the name of the Quran. However initially our requests were ignored. As I pressed and demanded answers to many questions, a proof for financial matters, I received no figures from Al-Huda, only assurances that money had been received or deposited. They appreciated my sincerity but kept on asking me to forgive and let go of feelings for the sake of Allah. I told them that this was no personal vendatta against anyone, it was a matter of the Deen, for which we cannot forgive, only Allah will forgive. All we can do is judge by Qur’an and sunnah what to do in this matter and surah An-Nisa ayah 105-110 provides the answer. (Please hear attached audio for Farha Rabbani’s tafseer of these ayat).
If we do not act upon Qur’an then what is the point of acquiring Qur’anic knowledge? What kind of Muslims are we? Finally on 28th May 2010 Ustazah decided that a change of teachers should take place or the class should be dissolved.

After that there was a most unfortunate turn of events. While her mother was away in Pakistan, Rabia refused to leave the class and carried on unabated. She announced in class that Ustazah had asked her to carry on? So we had to get the Mosque committee to get rid of her. After Ramadhan she was back with her fake Al-Huda class! Soon Farha Rabbani also arrived to join in. We could not allow this drama to continue and took immediate action. The Mosque banned her for a second time.

Farha Rabbani phoned me and I asked her whether she had brought proofs along with her, an explanation for the result and everything. Instead of admitting her mistakes, she was angry that I questioned her about money matters and her responses were, “Who are you to ask me about this”, “This is between me, my Allah and Al-Huda”, “Would you ask your mother such questions?” What nonsense she uttered! Is this Islam? About the result, she unashamedly continues to defend her stance that she has done nothing wrong! Her speech was full of lies and deceptions as usual. She was desperately trying to come to an agreement with us and let herself back in. I asked Ustazah what was going on and she replied that this class was not working under Al-Huda.

Farha Rabbani tried to impress everyone by telling that she is so rich back home in Pakistan (certainly not in London!), she has a big lovely house, she has no need to be taking fees? Does this count as a proof? If we accept this argument then it follows that Zardari must be the most honest person in Pakistan. What a joke!

Only a few days ago she arranged for a party in the Mosque. Maybe it was a celebration for the fact that she has now been kicked out of the Mosque twice (banned from taking classes) but she is still looking for a way back in! Does this sound like a Quran teacher to you or a professional con-artist who will go to all lengths to achieve her greedy ambitions? She continually dupes naïve ladies using emotional blackmail and continuous lying to gain support and sympathy that we have levelled a load of false allegations against her. She has even taken a number of false oaths already to prove that she is not a thief. Astaghfirullah!

Ya Allah! Does this woman have no shame? She is approaching her sixties but is more stubborn than a spoilt little child. If she is so keen on doing “Deen ka kaam”, why doesn’t she go back to the katchi abadis of Karachi or anywhere else in Pakistan where most effort needs to be focused? Why is she spreading fitnah in our Mosque and turning it into Masjid Dhirar? Why does she keep dragging herself to London in this old age? Alhamdulillah we have no shortage of teachers in London and certainly we have no need for the likes of greedy fraudsters like Farah Rabbani and Rabia Rabbani.

Such corrupt elements are a shame to the community, they are damaging the name of Islam and they need to be rooted out from every organisation! These people are capable of the most vicious lies, they are treacherous and totally dishonest. When put to the test, their true personality is revealed:evil, spiteful and malevolent. Intent on pursuing their vile deeds, these people have become resistant to advice and reform; if anything, they have grown more obstinate and arrogant. They take pride in spreading evil and corruption, with no remorse, sense of Guilt or fear of Allah. May Allah Guide them or give them what they deserve, Ameen.

So there you have it. The tragic story of our class is one of Dhulm, injustice and betrayal. I hope that we will all learn lessons from this. I was hoping not to make this public but following the latest antics of this Farha and Rabia Rabbani, I was left with no choice and I must warn you all about them. If some good can come from this incident, insha’Allah our efforts and sacrifices will not be in vain.

Wassalam.
Sofia.




APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 03/08/2011 :  21:28:23  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
SHOCKING REACTION UPON ALHUDA'S FRAUD IN U.K

Assalam alaykum,

Here is information that I received today from one of Farhat Hashmi's students that is of value.

Best of regards,
Nadeem
Dr. Farhat Hashmi Exposed!



Why Al-Huda International Cannot Be Trusted With Your Charity Money




Part 1





Dear All

Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu,



In this final episode of al-Huda WikiLeaks, we will be examining the role of Dr. Farhat Hashmi in the Farah Rabbani corruption case, the tragic true story of a London al-Huda class. For those of you new to all this, please check the attached document for background information.



Please note that me and my fellow students have gone to great pains to ensure that none is accused or blamed without right which is why all my claims have been based on evidence. For matters unresolved, I have sought answers and explanations from Dr. Farhat Hashmi herself, and it has taken 10 long months of patience and investigation. However they have not been co-operative or forthcoming with anything satisfactory. To add insult to injury, they recently redirected me back to Farah Rabbani for further clarifications. Therefore we have reached a dead end in our relationship with al-Huda.



I have drawn to the attention of Dr. Farhat Hashmi the audio evidence I am presenting today, and on the basis of this and everything else, on 29th Jan 2011, I advised her to resign from her teaching position/leadership at al-Huda for her dishonesty, betrayal of trust and abuse of authority; urging her to shun the pride, show humility, admit mistakes and repent to Allah, and not to follow in the footsteps of Farah Rabbani/shaytan. Needless to say, my appeals have gone unheeded and there was no reply, and no expression of regret, remorse or fear of Allah... A truly unfortunate scenario.



It is absolutely miraculous the way Allah has equipped me with all the proofs and evidences we needed to fight our case, Masha’Allah. So, all that remains for me is to declare the Truth because: “Verily those who conceal the clear proofs, evidences and the guidance, which We have sent down, after We have made it clear for the people in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allah and cursed by the cursers.” (2:159)



Till now, we have seen email evidence and documented result proofs of how top al-Huda figures have been involved in lying and cover-ups and corruption. As if the dodgy emails weren’t enough, today we will be presenting direct audio evidence that implicates ‘Ustazah’ Farhat Hashmi in lying, deception and slandering her own innocent al-Huda students in a public lecture. Therefore you may see this as a kind of public trial of Dr. Farhat Hashmi for a crime committed openly. We are the party that has been wronged so we must defend ourselves openly. This audio was taken from part 3 of “Misaali Ustad”, recorded in May 2010, from 33:38 mins onwards. For your convenience I have extracted the relevant clip as an attachment to this email.



Please open the audio file and prepare to be shocked!



The Evidence (1)



00:01 – ‘One person in a class turns out to cause extreme disturbance…’

This scenario is preparing the ground for the true incident coming up next. I guess Ustazah has me in mind when describing this one person causing extreme disturbance and we are compared to naughty little children in a class that will correct themselves eventually.



00:39 – ‘Shaytan is bound to intervene…..but we must ask for Allah’s help and continue’

Good old shaytaan to the rescue again. We have become rather familiar of this al-Huda policy of never admitting one’s own mistakes, just blame everything on shaytan and maintain your innocence. We also learn that teachers are encouraged to continue in such circumstances.



01:05 – ‘We had a student, very able, very good, very hardworking, very passionate, very dedicated…..’

This is the introduction to our corrupt, lying, cheating teacher Farah Rabbani. Ustazah is going out of her way in praising her. By this time (May 2010), I had sent a number of emails to al-Huda some of which have been released. Despite everything I said in my emails, Ustazah maintained a high opinion of her. In actual fact, our teacher was a good speaker and actor, clever politician, manipulative shrewd tactician, sly and cunning business woman.. So yes, very able and talented indeed.



01:15 – ‘She started work in a new place… big lesson for us all, I want to explain to you all’

The new place was London. She moved from Karachi to London. Why are these facts being hidden? Let the truth be out. You are about to teach us some lesson here, I hope you get your facts right, Ustazah..



01:30 – ‘That poor woman was doing dars here, there and everywhere; day and night..

SubhanAllah! Where did she do dars here there and everywhere exactly? She came here for Daura-e-Quran in 2008 and through your own contact Mrs. Sheikh and then Firdous, she was able to find a place in our local Mosque directly. She didn’t go through all this trouble beforehand as you say. She landed straight in the Mosque without having to frustrate herself here there and everywhere, day and night as you claim. This intro was designed to draw audience sympathy and support for this poor woman right from the outset.



01:37 – ‘Her home was here in Pakistan, in it a number of servants, a variety of comforts, all kinds of luxuries.. She left all that and took a ‘bacha’ (kid) to work in a new area, some other place.. And it is not easy to start work in a new place, especially where you don’t know anyone, but she worked very hard to establish everything. She started a class.’



Yes, her home was in Pakistan indeed. This confirms that she stepped foot internationally, in London like I stated. Next Ustazah is following in the footsteps of Farah Rabbani herself by impressing us with the wealth and riches of this teacher. What do her servants and luxuries have to do with anything? Most rich people in Pakistan are corrupt these days anyway. Just take a look at your leader and politicians. So what?

Anyway, what possessed her to leave all that, leave the country and step into the wilderness to set up a class with a bacha tagging along? Was everyone dead back home? This is a lie! Let me tell the truth: Farah Rabbani was not alone out here. She came to her daughter Rabia who is already here with her husband on a work permit. The ‘bacha’ actually landed here months later on a student visa and Farah Rabbani has been looking for a British rishta for him using the “al-Huda” marriage bureau and contacts.. It is not easy to start work in a new place I agree, but luckily, Farah Rabbani was able to find a place in our Mosque and immediately after Daura-e-Quran, she was able to sign up most people for a course and take over the existing class and teachers. So really, she didn’t work so hard to ‘establish’ the class after all.. Just gate-crash the Daura-e-Quran and towards the end sign up everyone for a course. Simple.

But hang on a minute, was this really a new place where she needed to be established? What about the proper al-Huda branch already established here not far from us, which I have mentioned in my previous emails? Why didn’t she go and team up with those people? Ustazah has even denied the existence of her own al-Huda site to add flavour to her story. How sad!



02:04 – ‘Forty to fifty people attending the class, the class read 10 paras, everything got done’

Bingo! This is definitely our class. We had this many people and we had completed ten paras. Where else in an international class did ‘fitnah’ break out after 10 paras? I challenge al-Huda to come out and deny this is us.



02:10 – Now, from them one or two people turned out.. who accused her of not being transparent in donations… And they began telling everyone… What was it, a small amount of fees money perhaps, and a small amount of other money according to the occasion, qurbani and other money here and there she had collected of donations. And whatever she collected, she wrote down every penny/paisa, and wherever she spent it, there was receipts and everything present. But it gave opportunity for those who wanted to allege/make an issue, to do so.’



Astaghfirullah, this is buhtanun azeem! Ustazah, is this what really happened? Well the teacher Farah Rabbani was in Pakistan at the time. She had left behind an incompetent daughter who cannot sit tafseer or teach a book, so she alone was finding it difficult to run the class. Our main concerns were about the way the class was being run and the fraudulent result for our ten paras. As for fees and donations, we wanted to verify from you if they really reached al-Huda and you know that. So our class problem did not start from accusations about finances. All the issues were addressed in the confidential class report I sent you in April 2010. Why didn’t you declare this? Why did you make us out to be some kind of mischief-makers and disturbers? Of course, if you told the truth, it wouldn’t suit your agenda would it?

And you say that she was writing down everything and there are receipts for everything. Another blatant lie. She was writing down nothing. I was closest to her and I saw her writing down nothing (except tafseer). Whenever anyone gave her money there were no receipts. And if al-Huda has a financial record then why is it that after 10 months of communicating with you, I have not seen a single figure or receipt from your end despite my many requests for verification on finances?? Were we wrong in referring the matter to authority? We are not talking a small amount of money here and there but money of the order of tens of thousands of pounds. Not even Farah Rabbani defended herself as much as you have defended her on money matters, SubhanAllah!



02:46 – And they created so much chaos, that everything was sabotaged.



Allahu Akbar! Another slander. Here we have been accused of creating fitnah and mischief in a Qura’n class. Actually we left the class (and we are more than 2 people by the way), and never returned. The remaining class continued. It was your own beloved Farah Rabbani that created fitnah when she started phoning up everyone from Pakistan, crying wolf and accusing us of being power-seekers that were after her chair!!

But your story still doesn’t make sense I’m afraid. If she was being so transparent, then why would anyone level an ‘accusation’ against her of being untransparent in the first place. Further how could they succeed in sabotaging a class? Hmm..By bringing in bulldozers perhaps? If these people were genuinely fitnah-makers, the Mosque could have banned them from class, right? Instead we find that Farah Rabbani has been banned twice by the Mosque from taking classes. How do you explain that, Ustazah?



02:53 – ‘This is a big trial. You cannot bear witness for anyone but like we read in surah Nur, that why didn’t you say about her: “This is a great lie”. You should have said, this isn’t possible, it doesn’t suit us to say this about anyone.`



I wish these al-Huda teachers would stop invoking religion like the ancient Jews to prove right their falsehood. Before the lectures on Misaali Ustad, Ustazah recorded a fresh version of surah Noor 2010 to drive home the same message of keeping a good opinion of anyone ‘accused’ of malpractice. Well, what if the sanctity of a Qur’an class has been violated and there is hard core evidence against someone, should we continue giving them the benefit of the doubt? Our teacher had cheated us in our results and I had proof of that. Al-Huda was not interested in this matter. When I finally scanned the result to Ustazah, she gave a strange comment on the result by saying that ‘Some policies have not been followed’. What was that supposed to mean? Some policies have been followed and some haven’t? Can something be both right and wrong? What we needed to hear was this, “Yes CHEATING has occurred here and I condemn it in the strongest terms. I am withdrawing Farah Rabbani and her daughter from your class straight away and sending in fresh teachers from my Ilford branch.” Or “I am dissolving this class immediately”. Wallahi, this issue could have been resolved in two days. However Ustazah kept the matter in doubt and confusion deliberately as she continued to secretly support her Farah Rabbani and propogate against us.



This was a big trial indeed, one in which Dr. Farhat Hashmi and her corrupt management has been exposed. And we students by the Grace of Allah have been exonerated. Alhamdulillah
(courtesy of brother Nadeem from Malaysia, May Allah Ta'ala bless him for his Jihad to Expose Falsehood and to defend Haq)
It is tragic and ridulous as well that MAD-AM Farhat Hashmi who associates sins with Prophets alaihe salaam in her commentaries as she said about Hazrat Adam alaihe salam in her interview on ARY,"Buhat beaabroo ho ker terey koochey sey ham nikley" is declaring her proven corrupt students as MAASOOMEEN (free of sins)????????????

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 03/08/2011 21:51:22
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 05/09/2011 :  22:20:57  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
DR FARHAT REFUTING HAZRAT ABDULLAH IBN E ABBAS RADIALLAHO TA'ALA:
Dr.Hashmi has stated in her audio titled Namaaz-e-nabwi regarding the Ayaat, "Wa idhaa qurial qur'aanu fastami'u lahuu wa ansituu"; she says "this is not regarding salaat".

When you read Allamah Ibn Katheer (rahmatullahi alayhi) tafseer he brings Ibn Abbas (radhi allaho anhu) as his source to explain the fact that this verse was revealed in regards to Salaat.

I humbly request a straight answer. So, either Ibn Abbas (radhi Allaho anhu) was anti-Islamic, Jamaat people OR Allamah Ibn Katheer needs to make taubah for falsely misguiding people on the understanding of this verse. So, Dr.Hashmi has spoken two three Lies.
1. One on Ibn Katheer
2. One on Ibn Abbas
3. One on the Messenger of Allah (sallahu alayhi wa sallam)

This hat trick is not even recorded in the annals of Islam from the greatest known hypocrites. The problem is that you don't read, you don't want to understand and you rather Insult the messenger of Allah, his Uncle and the illustrious Quranic Exegists just to tell everyone, "Those are jamaat people, Tablighi people who hate Dr.Hashmi". This is how Jews think. Rather than speaking the truth, you slip, slide and twist facts. Dr.Hashmi's explanation against Ibn Abbas (ra) is unacceptable; that has nothing to do with your confused mind and confusion you want to create. I am shocked that not one clear factual information has issued forth from your lips.

I would like your thoughts.
Jazaka Allah Khair
http://truth-sincerity.blogspot.com/2009/10/farhat-hashmi-another-zakir-naik.html

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 09/08/2011 :  02:23:05  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Aseer E Madina

DEMOLITION OF JANNAT AL BAQI BY THE INSPIRATIONAL MENTORS OF DR.FARHAT HASHMI
1:The way Dr.Farhat Hashmi is turning muslims to PHOBIACS OF SHIRK AND BIDDA and is demolishing the pre-existing pillers of faith but ALLAH SUBHANHU TA'ALA saves whom He wants to save from going astray,but exposing CRUELITIES is our duty, the scared graveyard of Jannat Al Baqi was demolished by the inspirational mentors of Dr.Farhat.
2:The part of cleavage of Mount Uhd in Madina which was touched by blessed head of Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wasallam and sweetest fragrance of Prophet's hair made hajeez kiss that part just because of Love of Rasool Allah sallallaho alaihe wassalam was plucked out to save people from SHIRK by the so called khadmein of haremain shareef ASTAGHFIRULLAH!
Where as history tells that Hazrat Asma Bint e Abu Bakar had gown of Rasool Allah sallallaho alaihe wasallam and she used to dip it in water to give it to those who asked for it for shifa.No one blamed her for committing Shirk.
Similarly, followers of Dr. Farhat Hashmi often invade mehfils of Melaad and shriek on women who kiss their thumbs after listening to blessed name of Rasool Allah sallallaho alaihe wassallam.Kissing thums like this is sunnah of Hazrat Abu Bakar radiallaho tala. Here is link in light of Hadith:
http://www.islamicacademy.org/html/Articles/Kissing_Thumbs.htm
Dr.Farhat's followers availed an empty hall one of the canadian university, hired buses to take her trapped victims,held Q/Answers session and FORBADE use of Rosary (Tasbeeh) by saying ISLAM MEI TADAAD MUQARAR NAEE HEI (Astaghfirullah Thus rejected teachings of ASHAB E SUFFAH who gained knowledge directly from Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wasallam. People with sound religious background hardly jump into her trap of "we love all Muslims" and stay away, even most of the muslim students didnot even leave their rooms of university hostels to attend Q/Ans session.


APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA



Image Insert: (31.66 KB)


Image Insert: (24.93 KB)

Proof of Demolition of Jannat Al Baqi which had mazaars in early 1900's, see the OLD and Recent Picture and realise the self-declared Islamic Actions which were against Islam and Sharia as well.
APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 09/08/2011 02:26:38
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 01/30/2012 :  10:36:09  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
How did Saudi Tribe became KINGS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqDTtVRI57U&feature=related

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 03/03/2012 :  05:56:00  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
ANOTHER SHOCKING BLASPHEMY BY DR.FARHAT HASHMI'S HEAD OF ZONE IN MIDDLE EAST AGAINST PARENTS OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM:

Upon knowing that dr.Farhat Hashmi's student said,"Quran is latest version of Bible having chapter on virgin Marry who was a believer but it doesnot mention parents of Muhammad", a sunni sister protested infront of the head of zone of ALHUDA of Dr. Farhat Hashmi.
Sunni Sister provided following proofs:
The majority of the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamah scholars adhere to the opinion that the parents of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) are recipients of salvation and are blessed with the bounties of paradise. The opinions of the scholars can be divided into three camps.

Camp One.
This camp states that the parents belonged to the period of Fitra (nature). The closest Prophet prior to this period was Isa (peace be upon him), who appeared six hundred years before our Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). During this period, the divine scripture revealed to Isa had become subject to alterations and changes. Rather than referring to him as the servant of Allah, people began referring to Isa as the son of God. If people of this period were to seek guidance, where would they attain it from? If they wanted to hear the truth, who would they hear it from? Furthermore, Isa (peace be upon him) was only sent for the guidance of Bani Israel, not for people universally. Isa did not preach the people of Arabia, and nor did his disciples. In light of these facts, the saying of Allah is applicable to such people of Fitra;

‘And We do not torment until We send a Messenger.’(17:15)

Allama Ali ibn Burhan al-Din writes in See'rah Halbiyya That:
‘Allama Ibn Hajr al-Haithami has mentioned that the correct opinion in which there is no doubt is that the people of Fitra are recipients of salvation. These are the ones to whom a messenger has not been sent to entrust them with the faith in Allah. Thus the Arabs- even in the time when prophets were sent to Bani Israel- were the People of Fitra, because these prophets were not instructed to preach the Arabs. Their task of preaching was restricted to Bani Israel.’ (Seerah Halbiyya. Imam Muhammad Abu Zuhra, vol. I, p. 103).

‘And never will your Lord destroy the towns (populations) until He sends to their mother town a Messenger reciting to them Our Verses’ (28: 59)

The scholars have divided the People of Fitra into three categories;

a. The first are those beings who through their own enlightened insight were able to deduce the oneness of Allah, like Qus ibn Sa’ida, Zaid ibn Amr ibn Nawfal and some of the kings of the community of Tubba.

b. The second are those who diverted from the religion of Ibrahim and began worshipping idols. They forced this misguided belief onto others too, like Amr ibn Lahy. There is no doubt that such people are destined for the Fire of Hell.

c. The third are those who through their lack of knowledge and disregard refrained from accepting other beliefs and remained firm on monotheism. They did not indulge in polytheism and idol-worship. These are the people who fall under the verse ‘And We do not torment until We send a Messenger.’

Regarding the faith of the Prophet’s parents, one position is that they belong to the people of Fitra. No prophet was sent to them from the time of Ismail up until the official announcement of Prophet-hood from Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), nor did they perform any act associated with disbelief.,


Camp Two

The second camp of scholars state that the parents of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never committed disbelief and polytheism. Throughout their lives, they remained firm on the religion of their forefather Ibrahim (peace be upon him), were known for noble moral qualities and they had unshaken belief in Allah’s oneness and in the Day of Judgement. ,

Imam Fakr al-Din Razi is one such advocate of this position. He writes,
‘Verily the fathers of the prophets were not disbelievers, because of the saying of Allah ‘He is the One who sees you when you stand; and when you were transferred in the loins of the prostrating ones.’ It is said the meaning is that his Nur transferred from one prostrating one to the next, proving that all the fathers of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) were Muslims.’ (Seerah Halbiyya. Imam Muhammad Abu Zuhra, vol. I, p. 103).


Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti writes in his book Masalak al-Hunafa,
‘This proof is based on two elements. Firstly, it is proven from authentic Ahadith that from the time of Adam to Abd Allah [the Prophet’s father], the Prophet’s lineage were the best of their people. No one was better than his lineage in any generation.

Secondly, it is proven from Ahadith and traditions that from the time of Adam up until the time of Abd Allah, there was no period in which at least some People of Fitra existed, who worshipped Allah, performed Salah for Him and thus through their means and blessings the earth was preserved [from destruction]. If it was not for them, the earth and all above it would have perished. If we hypothetically assume that the forefathers of the Prophet were polytheists, then we must ask; were they still better than the others of that generation or not? If his fathers were still deemed better, then this necessitates that a polytheist and disbeliever is better than a Muslim. This maxim can never be accepted. And if others from previous generations were better than the Prophet’s forefathers, then this too is unacceptable because it has been proven from authentic Ahadith that his ancestry were the best of each generation. Therefore, it can only be deduced that the forefathers of the Prophet were all monotheists and believers, and were the best of their generations.

Now we well mention the authentic Ahadith that verify the first element of the argument; that the Prophet’s forefathers were throughout the best of their generations.




Abu Nua’im writes in Dala’il al-Nabuwwa, with the chain of Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said,
‘Allah continued to transfer me from the loins of the pure to the wombs of the pure, clean and mannered. No two groups have appeared except I was the best of the two.’

Imam Tirmidhi has recorded a Hadith which he classified as Hasan (Fair) as well as Imam Baihaqi from Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said,

‘When Allah created me, He made me from the best of creations. Then when he created the tribes, he made me from the best of tribes. And when He created souls (nafs) He made me from the best of souls. Then when He created households, He made me from the best of households. Thus I am the best in terms of household, and the best in terms of souls.’

Imam Tabrani writes in Awsat and Imam Baihaqi in Dala’il, from Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said,
‘Jibrael (peace be upon him) said to me, ‘I have searched the earth, the easts and the wests. And I did not find a man better than Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and I did not find a clan better than the clan of Bani Hashim.’


After citing the above narration, Allama Suyuti includes the saying of Imam Ibn Hajar,

‘Imam Ibn Hajar said, ‘And it is known that being the best, being the chosen and preferred comes from Allah. And in the eyes of Allah, being the best cannot occur with Shirk (polytheism).’

These reports have clearly shown that the Prophet’s forefathers – in each generation – were the best people of their respective times. This superiority can only be achieved when they believe in Allah and their belief is not tarnished with polytheism. Now we will mention proof to support the second element (that from the time of Adam up until the time of Abd Allah, there was no period in which at least some People of Fitra existed).

Imam Abd al-Razzaq wrote in al-Musannaf, from the chain of Ma’mar, from Ibn Juraij, from Ibn al-Mussaiyab; Ali ibn Abu Talib (may Allah be pleased with him) said,

‘The earth has continuously been occupied with at least seven Muslims or more. If this was not the case, the earth and its inhabitants would have perished.’

This chain is authentic (Sahih) according to the conditions set by Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, and though it is saying of Ali (may Allah be pleased with him), we assume he heard it from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).



Ibn al-Munzir has mentioned in his exegesis with a sound chain, from Ibn Juraij in the commentary of the verse ‘O Allah! Make me[Ibrahim] an establisher of Prayer, and from my offspring’; he said, ‘there has remained from the offspring of Ibrahim to our Prophet people on Fitra who have worshipped Allah.

Other than these reports, support for this opinion is to found in the Qur’anic verse,

‘And (remember) when Ibrahim said to his father and his people: "Verily, I am innocent of what you worship. Except Him (i.e. I worship none but Allah Alone) Who did create me, and verily, He will guide me. And he made it [i.e. La ilaha ill-Allah] a Word lasting among his offspring (True Monotheism), that they may turn back. (43: 26-28)

In an explanation of this verse, the following quote is from Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him),

‘The saying of Allah ‘Word lasting among his offspring’ means that La ilaha ill-Allah remains in the offspring of Ibrahim.’

Allama Sharstani writes in al-Milal wa al-Nihal,
‘The religion (Din) of Ibrahim remained established, and the monotheism of Allah remained widespread amongst the Arabs. And the first to alter the religion of Ibrahim and initiate the worship of idols was Amr ibn Luhaiiy.’


According to the experts, from the time of Ibrahim (peace be upon him) to Kab ibn Luhiy, all his fathers were adherents of the Abrahamic faith, and Kab’s son Marra was also firm on this religion (as his father advised him to remain firm on this path). Between Marra and Abd al-Muttalib, there were four fathers; Kalaab, Qusa, Abd Munaf and Hashim. We have already highlighted evidence to show these men were adherents to monotheism. With regards to Abd al-Muttalib, the saying of Allama Sharstani in al-Milal wa al-Nihal is sufficient;

‘The Nur of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) appeared in the glances of Abd al-Muttalib. With the blessings of this Nur, he was inspired to perform a solemn promise rather than sacrifice his son. With the blessings of this Nur, he used to order his sons not to indulge in tyranny and rebellion and he used to encourage them to adopt the most noble of manners. And he used to prohibit them from indecent acts. And with the blessings of this Nur, he had the courage to say to Abraha ‘verily for this House [Kaaba] is a Lord.’

Furthermore, when the enemies suddenly began firing arrows to the Muslims in the Battle of Hunain, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) ascended his animal and charged into the battlefield saying,

‘I am the Prophet without doubt; I am the son of Abd al-Muttalib.’



If Abd al-Muttalib was not a monotheist, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) would never have taken pride in taking his name, since taking pride in a lineage of disbelief is prohibited.

Those narrations that suggest that the Prophet’s parents are disbelievers or are subject to punishment are weak (Daif). Even if we assume that these narrations are of acceptable standard, then they are still rejected in light of the clear verses (e.g. ‘And We do not torment until We send a Messenger’) that oppose it.

Uqba has said regarding the Hadith which Hakim has described as sound (Sahih) in his Mustadrak,

‘No, by Allah! For [the reporter in the chain] Uthman ibn Umair has been classified as weak by Imam Dar Qutni.’

Imam Zahabi took a legal Islamic oath regarding the weakness of this Hadith.

After this analysis, Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti wrote,

‘When in this issue there is nothing but weak reports, then investigation in it are pointless.’


Camp Three.
The opinion of some scholars is as such (as mentioned in Masalik al-Hunafa)

‘Allah Almighty resurrected his parents so that they brought faith in him. This opinion has generated support from a large group of Hadith experts and others, including Ibn Shaahin, Abu Bakr al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, Sohaili, Qurtubi, Muhibb Tabri and Allama Nasir al-Din Ibn al-Munzir.’

In this issue, the contemporary, outstanding scholar has offered an exceptional analysis. I will cite from his book Khatam al-Nabiyyin, which – after reading – the observer will be reassured and heart-warmed.

‘And there is no doubt that the report that says that the parents of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) are in the fire are Gharib (rare) in terms of meaning and in terms of the chain [of the Hadith]. This is because Allah Almighty says ‘And We do not torment until We send a Messenger.’ And his father as well as his mother belonged to the period of Fitra, so how can they punished? This is contrary to religious realities; one passed away before Muhammad came into physical existence and the other when he was only a child and a prophet had not been sent. Therefore, the report that says that they are in the fire are rejected, firstly because of the unreliable chain and secondly because of its distance from the reality.’



He proceeds to write from the depth of his heart,

‘And in reality, I feel that someone is striking my ears and understanding when I imagine that the Abd Allah and Amina are subject to the fire. This is because Abd Allah was a young man known for his patience; he was willing to be sacrificed according to the solemn promise of his father and placed his head forward for it. And when Quraish offered a Fidya of one-hundred camels in its place, he was content. He refrained from pointless play, leisure and sin despite his young age and beauty; when a woman tried to seduce him, he replied, ‘As for the forbidden [that you are enticing me towards, I would rather die.’ Why would he thus be punished in the fire, [in addition to the fact] a prophet’s call did not reach him?’ [Khatam al-Nabiyiin. Imam Muhammad Abu Zuhra. Vol. I, p. 132-4.]

As for the Prophet’s mother, this is the woman who experienced the death of her husband shortly after marriage, and thus responded with unparalleled patience and brought up her orphan child. No one can imagine that such a woman would be punished in the fire, despite the fact that no prophet came to her to give her guidance to Islam and to teach her monotheism.



He concludes by writing,

‘In conclusion and after studying all the reports in this matter, the parents of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) were from the people of Fitra, were close to guidance and noble manners as preached by his son thereafter. After analysing the Quranic verses and Ahadith, we cannot state that they are in the fire; his mother was a hard-working, patient woman who was caring to her son. There is no evidence present that suggests she is deserved of punishment in the fire. Rather, evidence points to the necessity of praising her and her husband, the one known as the Zhabih and Tahir…

…We have not reached this conclusion merely because our love for the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), though we pray to Allah to increase our love for him. We have reached this conclusion because it is a result of common sense, logic, strong proofs from Shariah and the Khuluq Mustaqim that point us in this direction.’

I will conclude the analysis with the decree of Qazi Abu Bakr ibn Arabi, a great Maliki Imam and the author of Tafsir Ahkam al-Quran,

‘Qazi Abu Bakr ibn Arabi was asked about a man who said that the Prophet’s parents were in the fire. He replied, ‘whosoever says such is cursed (Mal’un), since Allah Almighty said, ‘verily those who hurt Allah and His Messenger; Allah curses them in this world and the hereafter.’ And there is no hurt greater that ‘father of such and such is like that.’
Note: Wahabiyah/Salafiyah considers Qazi Abu Bakr ibn Arabi as a High authority.


[red]NOW SEE THE REPLY OF HEAD OF ZONE OF DR.FARHAT'S ALHUDA IN MIDDLE EAST:[/red]This is what I know about the Prophet's (pbuh) parent. The info beneath is not my own research but a reply of the Shaykh who was asked about the Prophet's parents.
How come the father of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is in Hell, even though he never heard the Message? For the same reason, why was the Prophet (peace be upon him) not allowed to pray for his mother's forgiveness? I also heard that the parents of the Prophet (peace be upon him) were brought back to life so that they could believe in him. Is this true?

Regarding the parents of the Prophet (peace be upon him) we say: It is well known that Allah will not punish someone except after the call to Islam reaches him. This would include the people who lived before the advent of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). It also applies to the children of the unbelievers, people who are insane, and those who are born deaf and blind. All such people will be tested on the Day of Judgment.

There are some hadîth related about the parents of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Abû Hurayrah relates that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “I had sought Allah permission to allow me to beseech forgiveness for my mother, but He did not allow me to do so, and I sought Him permission to allow me to visit her grave and he allowed me to do so.” [Sahîh Muslim (976)]

Anas relates that a man asked the Prophet (peace be upon him): “O Messenger of Allah, where is my father?”

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “In the Fire.” When the man left, the Prophet (peace be upon him) called to him and said: “My father and your father are in the Fire.” [Sahîh Muslim (203)]

It is related by way of Ibn Mas`ûd that the two sons of Mulaykah came to the Prophet (peace be upon him) and said: “Our mother used to show respect to her husband and affection to her children…” and they mentioned something about the guest “…but she buried alive an infant daughter in the times of ignorance.”

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Your mother is in the Fire.”

They turned away with expressions of pain clearly visible in their faces. The Prophet (peace be upon him) called for them. They returned with expressions of pleasure on their faces, in hope that something had changed.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “My mother is with your mother.” [Musnad Ahmad (3598)]

These hadîth are used as evidence by some scholars that the parents of the Prophet (peace be upon him) had been acquainted with the message of truth. The Arabs to whom the Prophet (peace be upon him) was sent were familiar with the religion of Abraham (peace be upon him), and that is why there were among them some true believers who did not commit polytheism, such as Zayd b. `Amr and Qiss b. Sâ`idah.

Al-Nawawî in his commentary on hadîth 203 of Sahîh Muslim speaks about the hadîth of Anas, saying [Commentary on Sahîh Muslim (3/79)]:
This shows that those whoever dies upon unbelief will be in the Fire and will not get any benefit on account of his relatives. It also shows that those (people in Arabia) who had died during the era in which the Arabs used to worship idols are also among the denizens of the Fire. This is not a case of holding them to account before they received the Message, because they had already received the Message of of Abraham and other Prophets (peace be upon them all).

The Prophet’s saying: “My father and your father are in the Fire” is an act of good will, to help ease the pain by sharing in the affliction.
Imam al-Nawawî also comments on the hadîth in which the Prophet (peace be upon him) was not permitted to beseech forgiveness for his mother. He writes [Commentary on Sahîh Muslim (7/45)]:
This shows us that it is permissible to visit polytheists while they are alive and to visit their graves after they die. It follows from the permissibility of visiting them after death that it is permissible to do so when they are alive. Allah says: “Yet bear them company in this life in a good manner.” [Sûrah Luqmân: 15] It also shows that it is prohibited to beseech forgiveness for the unbelievers.
It is possible that these hadîth intend only that people who die on other than monotheism and faith must be treated as disbelievers in this life; so it will not be allowed for anyone to pray for them or beseech forgiveness for them. This is because they appear to us as unbelievers. However, their true fate rests with Allah.

And Allah knows best.

It is related in some weak and false hadîth that Allah brought the Prophet’s parents back to life so that they could believe in him. Then they were made to die again. A good number of scholars have declared these hadîth to be fabricated. Refer to: Tafsîr Ibn Kathîr (3/462), al-Hâwî fi al-Fatâwî by al-Suyûtî (2/352) and al-Rawd (2/185).

Ibn Taymiyah writes [Majmû` al-Fatâwa (4/324)]:
There is no disagreement among those acquainted with the field that this is among the most obvious of fabricated lies, as has been clearly stated by the scholars. It is not found in any of the accepted hadîth works, not in any Sahîh or Sunan or Musnad, or any other recognized hadîth work.

It has never even been mentioned by the authors of the books of campaign and the books of Qur’ân commentary, even though they narrate weak hadîth together with authentic ones, since recognition of what is false is not hard to ascertain.

Had it been true, great attention and care would have been paid to its transmission, since contains two miraculous acts; the first being that of bringing the dead back to life and the second being that of believing after death.

The narration of such an event would take priority over anything else. It follows that since no trustworthy narrators ever mentioned it, it must be declared as false.

Moreover, it goes against the Qur’ân, the authentic Sunnah, and consensus.

Allah says: “Of no effect is the repentance of those who continue to do evil, until death faces one of them, and he says: ‘Now have I repented indeed’; nor of those who die rejecting faith.” [Sûrah al-Nisâ’: 18]

Allah shows us that there is no accepted repentance for the one who died as an unbeliever.

A man asked the Prophet (peace be upon him): “O Messenger of Allah, where is my father?”

The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “In the Fire.” When the man left, the Prophet (peace be upon him) called to him and said: “My father and your father are in the Fire.” [Sahîh Muslim (203)]

Then there is the hadîth about preventing the Prophet (peace be upon him) from beseeching forgiveness. If beseeching their forgiveness had been something permissible in its own right, he would not have been forbidden from doing so. Deeds are according to how the person concludes his life, so whoever dies on faith, Allah will forgives him and consequently beseeching his forgiveness will not be prohibited.

As for the Prophet (peace be upon him) visiting his mother’s grave, it was on his way to al-Hujûn near Mecca. As for his father, he was buried in Syria, so how could he have been brought to life for him?

Had the parents of the Prophet (peace be upon him) been believers, they would be more renowned than Hamzah and al-`Abbâs, the uncles of the Prophet (peace be upon him).
And Allah knows best. "

SUNNI SISTER GOT SHOCKED AND TRIED TO CONVINCE THAT BADBAKHT ,GUSTAAKH, MAY ALLAH'S ETERNAL CURSE FALL UPON BLASPHEMERS,HERE IS REPLY OF SUNNI SISTER FROM MIDDLE EAST:


Sharing only for knowledge sake, while reading Surah e Albaqar, my teacher told that words ABB and UMM are also used for chacha and chachee in arabic language as in verse
133 of Surah e Al Baqar:





Translation:

On the contrary, some of you were present, when death came to Yaqoob, when he said to his sons, 'whom you will worship after me', said they 'we shall worship He Who is your God and of your fathers Ibrahim and Ismail and Ishaque, the one God and to Him we have submitted ourselves'.

on basis of above verse AAZAR was Prophet Ibrahim's CHACHA as in Zia-ul_Quran, name of Prophet Ibrahim's father is mentioned as "Taarikh".
Love with real uncles is natural that is why Hazrat Ibrahim tried his level best to enlight his uncle but it was not will of Allah.



Similarly, Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wassallam's chacha ABU LAHAB and Chachee (Abu Lahab's wife) were for sure in fires of hell and ahadith cited by fwded mail of Nabila MIGHT BE about Abu Lahab and his wife. As Prophet Muhammad is blessed with the most sympathetic heart among human beings, he even forgave Hinda who disgraced dead body of Hazrat Hamza but later accepted Islam , he didnot intend to harm Abu Lahab and his wife for personal revenge, but Allah never SPARED his enemies, Prophet's REHMAT FOR ALL THE WORLDS is beyound measure , He even read Namaaz e Janaza of Abdullah ibn e Ubaee but Allah declared His decision in verse 80 of Surah e Touba that He is not going to forgive enemy of Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wassallam:



Moreover, Hazrat Ibrahim alaihe salaam and Hazrat Ismail alaihe salam did dua while raising walls of Kaaba:
Surah e Albaqar, verse 128, 129:






'O Our Lord! Make us submissive to You and of our offspring a nation submissive to You, tell us our ways of worship, and turn to us with Your mercy. Surely, You alone are most Relenting and Merciful.

'O Our Lord, and send in them a messenger from among themselves, who may recite to them Your signs and teach them Your Book and wise knowledge and may purify them well. Surely, You are alone the Predominant, the Wise
And Ibrahim left the legacy of the same religion to his sons and Yaqoob too; that 'O my sons, surely Allah has chosen this religion for you, therefore die not, but as Muslim.

And Quran announces that above dua is accepted by Allah:
Surah e Aal e Imran, verse 164:




"
Undoubtedly, Allah did a great favour to the Muslims that in them from among themselves sent a Messenger who recites unto them His signs and purifies them and teaches them the Book and wisdom, and necessarily before that they were certainly in apparent error. "


SUBHAN ALLAH! please note .."Allah did great favour to the Muslims"(those who were already on deen e ibrahim including parents and grand parents of Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wassallam".It is not written that Allah did great favour to People in general OR did ehsaan on non-believers.
May Allah bless my teacher and keep us on right path always, Aameen.(explanation in light of Zia-ul_quran and Zia-un-Nabi by Justice (rtd) Karam Shah Al Azhari)
Allah Knows the best.
Assalam o Alaikum!
Alhamdullillah! Its my honour to get benefits from researches of Jalal ul Din Imam Syuti whom Allah honoured with seeing Prophet sallallaho alaihe wassallam 70 times( in dreams+in state of wakefulness) Subhan Allah! The researches of ancient scholars recommended by my teacher cited maximum possible verses of Quran, maximum possible sayings of Prophet sallallaho alaihe wassallam and maximum possible opinions of scholars on ONE TOPIC instead of relying on one sheikh or scholar.
According to my teacher , regarding Prophet Muhammad sallallaho alaihe wassallam, if slightest misunderstanding is that JOOZ(part) that wastes KOOL(whole) and Allah REJECTS whole:
'O believers! Raise not your voices above the voice of the Communicator of unseen (the Prophet) and speak not aloud in presence of him as you shout to one another, lest your works become vain while you are unaware.


"LA TASH O'ROON" or "While you are unaware confirms that Allah doesnot let the gustaakh to realise his disrespect to Prophet sallallaho alaihe wassallam thats why i donot even let voice of those scholars enter my ears whom i myself have heard being disrespectfully CASUAL regarding Prophets alaihe salaam.
Rest, Allah knows the best."
Muslim Ummah MUST UNITE to curb this FITNA, special responsibility lies on sunneez of Toronto ,Ontario,Canada Where Dr.Farhat is residing and Edmonton ,Alberta,Canada, Where dr.Farhat's is residing!

The SUNNI SISTER requested to share above info with maximum possible muslims as soon as possible so that muslims can save their eemaan in their life time.














APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA

Edited by - Aseer E Madina on 03/04/2012 00:14:37
Go to Top of Page


Aseer E Madina
New Member

Canada
94 Postsing

Posted - 03/08/2012 :  14:49:16  Show Profile Send Aseer E Madina a Private Message  Reply with Quote
SPEECH BY SUNNI SCHOLAR MAZHAR SIYALVI SAHIB EXPOSING FITNAAZ:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdMDieGmekY&feature=related

APNAY DAMAAN E SHIFA'AT MEI CHUPAYE RAKHNA,,MEREY SARKAAR (SALLALLAHO ALAIHE WASSALLAM) MEREE BAAT BANAYE RAKHNA
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4  Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Forum ..:: NooreMadinah Network © NooreMadinah Network Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000